Background:-Onychomycosis is invasion of nail plate by fungus, caused by both dermatophytes & non-dermatophytes. In this study, the main aims & objectives are identification of various clinical forms, microbiological agents & epidemiology of onychomycosis as well as its association with various dermatological conditions & systemic diseases in western Rajasthan. Materials and Methods:-The study involved a total of 150 cases of onychomycosis which was suspected on clinical basis. Subsequently KOH examination & culture was done for identification of microbiological agents causing the disease. Patients were also looked for other skin & systemic diseases. Results:-In our study, the incidence of onychomycosis was 1.8%. It occurs more commonly in men between age group of 20-50 years, accounting for 80% of total cases. Housewives, office workers, farmers & cattle workers were more commonly affected. Distal & lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO) was seen in 85.33% cases. Toenails & fingernails were affected in 55.9% & 34.6% cases, respectively. KOH was positive in 48.6% cases. Culture showed growth in 37.3% cases. Trichophyton rubram was the most common etiological agent. Associated Keratoderma, asteotic eczema, psoriasis & raised blood sugar was seen in 5%, 2.5%, 2.5% & 6.66% cases, respectively. Conclusion:-The present study concluded that onychomycosis has an incidence of 1.8% & occurs mainly in age group of 30-40 years of housewives, office workers, farmers & cattle workers. DLSO was most common clinical type affecting toenails more commonly than fingernails & T.rubram was the most common etiological agent.
Onychomycosis is invasion of the nail plates by fungus both dermatophytes & non-dermatophytes. Invasion of nail plate by a dermatophyte is specifically described as tinea unguim. Onychomycosis is caused by dermatophytes, candida & saprophytes. The principal dermatophytes concerned are—T. rubrum, T. mentagrophytes, T. tonsurans, T. violaceum and T. soudanensei & E. floccosum. Microsporum species does not cause onychomychosis. Although onychomycosis may be the only manifestation of fungus disease in a patient, in the great majority of cases they are associated with tinea pedis or tinea manuum.
Some factors such as diabetes, aging, atopy, immunodeficiency virus, immunosuppressive therapy, psoriasis, trauma, genetic factor, tinea pedis & hyperhydrosis are considered as predisposing factors. Dermatophytes are evolving as major causative pathogens in countries such as Pakistan, Korea, Canada, India & UK while yeasts are most frequently reported in Spain, Italy, Saudi Arabia & Iran.
Four distinct patterns of onychomycosis have been described-
Distal and lateral subungual onychomycosis (DLSO):- It is the most common pattern and usually presents as a streak or a patch of discoloration, white or yellow at the free edge of the (
Superficial white onychomycosis(SWO) :- The dorsal surface of the nail plate is eroded in well-circumscribed powdery white patches, often away from the free edge. Toenail is more affected & is seen more commonly due to T. mentagrophytes. (
Proximal subungual onychomycosis(PSO) :- mainly seen in AIDS patients & is commonly caused by T. rubram.Rapid invasion of the nail plate from the posterior nail fold may develop to produce a white nail with only marginal increase in thickness.(
Endonyx onychomycosis :-This is associated with endothrix scalp infections, notably by T.soudanense. The nail plate is scarred with pits and lamellar splits.(
nail plate, often near the lateral nail fold. The nail plate becomes thickened & there may be subungual hyperkeratosis.
BODY TEXT
Identification of various clinical forms & etiological agents of onychomycosis in Western Rajasthan.(
Epidemiology of onychomycosis.(
Association of various skin conditions with onychomycosis.(
Prevalence of onychomycosis in some systemic diseases. (
This study was conducted on 150 cases of onychomycosis attending the OPD of department of skin & VD of MDM hospital associated with Dr. S. N. medical college, Jodhpur.
Disease was suspected on clinical basis. Distal end of nail was taken for examination. KOH examination & culture on Sabouraund”s was done for identification of microbiological agents causing the disease. Patient was also looked for other skin & systemic diseases.
In the present study the incidence of onychomycosis was found to be 1.8% of total patients the OPD of skin department. The incidence of superficial mycosis reported earlier from different part of India varied [Sobhandhari et al in Guntur(
The worldwide prevalence of onychomycosis is increasing. A number of factors may contribute to this rise such as diabetes, poor peripheral circulation, immunosuppression (due to HIV & immunosuppressive drugs), increased participation in sports activity, genetic factor, trauma to nail etc.
Onychomycosis is the disease of middle age group and so maximum number of cases was seen in 20 to 50 years old patients forming 80% of the total onycomycosis cases in the study4.Maximum percentage was seen between 30-40 years old patients.Children formed only 7.5% of the total cases. None of the child was below 10 years of age, specifying the disease usually present in middle age group. Kaur et al(
Male outnumbered females in all the age groups forming 61.6% of total cases. This observation matched well with the majority of survey reported so far Shah et al(
Family history of onychomycosis was seen only in 9% cases. RSN Brilhante in northest Brazil found 14% of patients giving family history of onychomycosis.
Urban patients were more in numbers as than rural ones because of prolonged wearing of closed footwear by office workers & more works with water by housewives.
Most cases presented, were having onychomycosis since 6 months making it a chronic disease.Shukla et al (
Toenail onychomycosis (56%) was more frequent than fingernail onychomycosis(34%). Also 10% had concurrent involvement of both toe & fingernails. Gupta et al in Shimla also found greater involvement of toenails (57%) as compared to fingernails(32%).
In various studies right thumb was the commonest fingernail involved. Greater toenail onychomycosis has been reported frequently, this is in agreement with other studies(
In the study, DLSO(85%) was the commonest clinical type followed by WSO(6%).Rook’s textbook of Dermatology also states DLSO as the most common subtype. Gupta et al also found DLSO (73.1%) as the most common subtype. Toenail dystrophy was seen in 6 patients only which indicates patients does take up treatment in time for onychomycosis. In both toenail & fingernail DLSO was the most common subtype. White superficial onychomycosis was most commonly seen in toenails.
Culture positivity in present study was 37.3% and KOH was positive in 48.6%.Both investigations were positive in 30% of the cases. While Gupta et al observed 67.7% positivity for both the tests, KOH & culture positivity were 59.2% and 37% which is in concordance with our study of higher positivity of KOH. T.rubram appears to be the most common dermatophyte causing DLSO in 30-35% culture positive patients as compared to T.mentegrophytes which were only detected in only a few patients. Nilay Kanti Das et al also reported T.rubram (29%) amounting for the majority of dermatophytes. This high prevalence of T.rubram has been attributed to its ability to adapt to hard keratin of the nail.C.albicans has been reported to be most commonly found non-dermatophyte isolate in many studies[Alfred Ammoury et al in Lebanon(56%).C.albicans is reported as the commonest cause of paronychial onychomycosis. This is reflected in our study where all the paronychial cases grew candida albicans on culture. Isolation of non dermatophyte mould in our 32% cases is higher than that seen in other studies [Nilay Kanti Das et al(22%);Gupta et al(19%).This could be because of frequent exposure to soil saprophytes in our patients.
The most common mould isolate was the Aspergillus species seen in 9 patients which wass also the most common mould reported by other studies [Gupta et al(6.4%) and Nilay Kanti Das et al(18%)]. Other non-dermatophytes mould isolated were Rhizopus, Mucor, Curvalaria & Penicillum.
T.rubram was the most common organism infecting both finger & toenails. C.albicans was mostly isolated from fingernails indicating the fungus as an important organism seen in paronychia. Similar results were seen in a study done in Indonesia(
Tenia pedis, Tenia mannum, Tenia capitis & Tenia cruris were found in 8, 6, 3, & 2 patients, respectively.
Some of the other dermatological conditions seen in association with onychomycosis were keratoderma, asteatotic eczema, psoriasis in 7, 4 & 4 patients, respectively. Nilay Kanti Das et al(
Only 2 patients were found HIV positive. One showed proximal nail involvement which is in lines with the previous studies.
The incidence of onyhomycosis in our department was 1.8%.Most of the cases were in the age group between 20-50 years forming 80% of total cases. Males overshadowed females in all age group forming 61.6% cases.
Farmers, cattle workers, office workers & housewives were the main people affected by the disease forming 60% of the total cases. Fingernails were affected mainly in housewives while toenail was involved mainly in office workers.60% of the total cases were from urban area.
Most common clinical variant seen was DLSO, forming 85.3% cases. Most of the nails affected were toenails forming 56% of the diseased nail seen.
Associated tenia capitis, tinea mannum, tinea pedis and tinea cruris were seen in 2%, 4%, 5.33% & 1.33% cases, respectively.
48.6% cases were KOH positive & 37.3% cases were culture positive while 30% of cases were both KOH & culture positive.
Trichophyton rubrum, Aspergillus & Mucor species were commonly seen in toenail. Most common organism isolated was trichophyton rubram.
Keratoderma was associated with 5% cases while asteatotic ezema & psoriasis were recorded in 2.5% cases. Raised blood sugar was seen in 6.6% of cases. Two cases of HIV were seen in which one case presented with proximal subungual onychomycosis.
KOH % culture positivity in clinically suspected cases
|
||
|
72 | 48.66% |
|
56 | 37.33% |
|
45 | 30.0% |
Fungal isolates and clinical types of onychomycosis
|
|
|||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
||||||||
T.rubram | 17 | 1 | 1 | - | 1 | 1 | 1 | 22(39.28%) |
T.mentagrophytes | 1 | 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | 3(5.35%) |
T.verrucosum | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
|
||||||||
Candida |
9 | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 12(21.4%) |
|
||||||||
Rhizopus | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3(5.35%) |
Aspergillus | 7 | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 | 9(16.1%) |
Mucor | 5 | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 6(10.7%) |
Curvalaria | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1(1.78%) |
Penicillum | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
Fusarium | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 0 |
|
43 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 56(100%) |
Relation of site of infection with occupation
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 | 14 | 2 | 22 |
|
13 | 3 | 3 | 19 |
|
1 | 34 | 3 | 38 |
|
20 | 7 | 3 | 30 |
|
1 | 9 | 0 | 10 |
|
1 | 4 | 0 | 5 |
|
3 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
|
8 | 12 | 2 | 22 |
|
52 | 84 | 14 | 150 |