Articles

To vaccinate or not to vaccinate is this doubt justified?

Luiz Antonio Del Ciampo, Ieda Regina Lopes Del Ciampo,
Article Date Published : 14 September 2018 | Page No.: 4056-4060 | Google Scholar

Abstract

Immunization, one of the most successful and cost-effective public health interventions for reducing infant and child morbidity and mortality globally has been passing, in recent times, by a crisis of acceptance by the lay public, which has greatly reduced vaccine coverage worldwide. This article presents the importance of vaccines for individual and collective health, discusses about some adverse effects and the reasons for refusal to vaccinate, and proposals to overcome these barriers and to increase the effectiveness of vaccination programs.

Introduction

Immunization, one of the most successful and cost-effective public health interventions for reducing infant and child morbidity and mortality globally, is a core component of the human right to health and an individual, community and governmental responsibility (1). Since the first vaccine was discovered vaccination remains one of the greatest public health achievements, preventing millions of deaths each year and protected from the threat of vaccine-preventable diseases, and contributing to the eradication of diseases such as poliomyelitis and smallpox. [ 2 , 3 , 4 ].

Vaccines are among the most effective tools available for preventing infectious diseases and their complications and sequels. High immunization coverage has resulted in drastic declines in vaccine-preventable diseases, particularly in many high- and middle-income countries [ 5 ]. It is estimated that, in 201 5 , there were nearly 2,4 billion episodes of acute diarrhea in whole world, of which almost 1 billion occurred in children younger than 5 years, with approximately 500.000 deaths [ 6 ].

In the last 15 years great advances have been made in developing and introducing new vaccines and expanding the reach of immunization programming [ 4 ]. For the efficiency of this programming a high percentage of vaccinated people are essential, because in addition to individual protection, they contribute to held immunity [ 2 ].

Herd immunity is the indirect protection of unvaccinated people in a largely vaccinated population that provides a safety net for those who cannot receive vaccination [ 7 ]. To be effective herd immunity requires that approximately 95% of the population be vaccinated. Therefore, the decision to receive a vaccine has consequences not only for the individual but for others in community, since outbreaks of vaccine-preventable disease often start among persons who refused vaccination and spread rapidly within unvaccinated

populations. [ 5 , 8 , 9 ].

Despite their effectiveness in preventing and eradicating disease routine childhood vaccine uptake remains suboptimal and, in some countries, rates of under vaccination in children under than 2 years continue to rise [ 10 ].

The decrease in the incidence of many vaccine-preventable disease leads to the perception that the severity of the disease and susceptibility to it have decreased. On the other hand, concern about real or perceived adverse events associated with vaccines has increased. This extended level of concern often results in an increase in the number of people refusing vaccines. [ 5 ].

Routinely vaccines are administered to healthy children to prevent, and not treat disease, and this can lead to the false impression that the risk of disease is low. Individual may not be aware of any immediate personal benefit because they are not ill when vaccinated and the health gain occurs in future disease episodes avoided [ 11 ]. Due to the child's vulnerability the risk and sequels of vaccine-preventable diseases are variable during childhood, and young children are at increased risk for illness and death related to infectious diseases. Children who did not receive pertussis vaccine had a 23-fold increased risk of developing the disease [ 5 , 12 ].

Vaccine components and safety

Vaccine is a specific immune preparation applied, usually through invasive means, into the human body, with the purpose of immunizing against pathogen infection [ 3 ]. Although there are historical records of some emerging practices for smallpox prevention in India, Turkey and the African continent, it is due to Edward Jenner the beginning of the modern era of vaccination when, in 1798, he published the results of inoculation of the bovine poxvirus in 2 3 individuals, initiating the first attempt of mass vaccination. Due to this pioneering action, almost 200 years later the eradication of smallpox was achieved, with the last case described in 1977 in Somalia [ 14 ].

The journey since then has not been easy and without precariousness because like others pharmaceutical agents, vaccine may have unintended side effects though nearly 90% were not adverse events [ 15 ]. Common reatogenicity events reported occur due to a chemical irritation which can be caused by adjuvant (a substance that is incorporated into some vaccine formulations to enhance the immune response on the vaccinate subject) like phenol, 2-phenoxyethanol, and even natural latex present in the rubber stoppers of some vaccine vials and on the plugger in some prefilled syringes [ 16 , 17 ]. The majority of these events include injection site reactions (erythema, swelling, warmth) and pyrexia which were transient and occurred within 1 or 2 days of vaccination [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. However, in very small situations, immunostimulatory effects that are necessary to increase the effectiveness of the vaccine can lead do undesirable effects if exceeding certain limits [ 16 , 21 ].

With the focus on vaccine safety D’Alo et al [ 22 ] analyzed the possible adverse reactions of some products and found that it is not possible to conclude with scientific rigor on casual relationships (or the lack thereof) between vaccines and adverse event [ 23 , 24 ]. With this same objective some authors concluded that infection with measles, mumps or rubella cause more severe adverse effects than the respective vaccine [ 25 ]. Studies suggest that influenza infection has a stronger association with Guillain-Barrè Syndrome (GBS) than does the vaccine [ 26 , 27 ] and the hypothetical risk of GBS, if any, cannot be considered a legitimate reason to limit MMR administration [ 28 ].

Immunization safety concerns have become increasingly prominent with the near elimination of many vaccine preventable diseases worldwide. With the enormous success of vaccines, public awareness has shifted from vaccine effectiveness to vaccine safety with most vaccines being administered to healthy individuals, safety assessments are crucial to maintaining public trust in immunization programs. WHO/UNICEF have made great strides to implement the Global Vaccine Action Plan and to establish National Immunization Technical Advisory Groups in whole world. [ 29 ].

Vaccines are administered as prophylactics to healthy individuals and the risks of vaccines (real or alleged) are visible while their benefits are impossible to evaluate from an individual perspective. Individual decision-making regarding vaccination is complex and involves emotional, cultural, social, spiritual and political factors as much as cognitive factors [ 30 ].

Vaccine hesitance and refusal

Opposition to vaccination has occurred since smallpox vaccination was introduced in Europe, in the 18th century [ 31 ] and nowadays it is more common to be afraid of vaccination than the disease against which we are fighting [ 32 ].

One of the reasons for low vaccination rates is currently called “vaccine hesitancy movement” that can be understood as a worldwide social phenomenon which can reach not only the unvaccinated individuals but also the entire population due to not enable the held immunity and increase the risk of outbreaks of many infectious diseases [ 33 ].

World Health Organization describe vaccine hesitancy as the delay in acceptance or refusal of vaccination despite availability of vaccination services [ 34 , 35 ]. This phenomenon is globally increasing influenced by some characteristics as education level, socioeconomic status, ethnicity, race, religious beliefs, ethical, philosophic and ideological concerns, and contribute to the persistence of outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccine hesitancy is associated with increased morbidity, higher emergency department utilization rates, inpatient admission, and death [ 10 , 36 , 37 ].

Vaccine refusal or hesitancy has been associated with perceptions of susceptibility/risk and severity of disease, safety and effectiveness of vaccines, in addition to the trust in healthcare providers and system [ 38 ]. Younger generations have forgotten the real importance of vaccination and ignore the fear of diseases which in the past caused enormous number of victims [ 32 ]. Individuals and physicians living in areas with successful immunization programs are likely to lack experience with some vaccine-preventable diseases. This reduction in incidence leads to a decreased perception of the severity and susceptibility to these diseases [ 25 , 29 ].

Before the 21st century vaccination programs were commonly recognized as one of the most cost-effective public health interventions and the arrival of new vaccines was almost always welcomed by public health decision-makers and clinicians [ 30 ]. Nowadays, outbreaks of disease due to vaccine hesitancy cause unnecessary suffering and potential death of young children and are wasteful of limited local health department resources [ 38 , 40 ].

Some people understand that vaccines are an unwelcome and unnatural incursion into a natural body which they view as unneeded or unbeneficial [ 41 ]. Due to the reduction in the incidence of vaccine-preventable diseases, the memory of several infectious diseases has faded from the public consciousness and the risk–benefit calculus seems to have shifted in favor of the perceived risks of vaccination in some parents' mind [ 5 ].

Reasons not to vaccinate

One of the most important arguments used by parents not to vaccinate their children is philosophical one that is, based on a liberal conception of individual’s rights to self-determine about her/his health, body, and life [ 13 ]. Several anti-vaccine arguments have caused a great drop in immunization rates in many countries [ 10 , 42 ], and many parents consider vaccines unsafe and unnecessary because diseases that were once the cause of loss of health and life are now rarely seen, virtually unknown to the general population, precisely because they have been prevented by vaccines [ 43 , 44 ]. Among the various reasons for not vaccinating some can be highlighted: [ 10 , 13 , 17 , 33 , 34 , 42 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 48 ]

  1. immune system, and the natural immunity is better than immunity induced by vaccines;1) immune system, and the natural immunity is better than immunity induced by vaccines;

  2. diseases declined on their own due to improved hygiene and sanitation;2) diseases declined on their own due to improved hygiene and sanitation;

  3. the child’s immune system is too immature to handle vaccines;3) the child’s immune system is too immature to handle vaccines;

  4. vaccines had never been tested in true vaccinated versus unvaccinated study;4) vaccines had never been tested in true vaccinated versus unvaccinated study;

  5. vaccines are toxic and contain dangerous chemicals that can lead to hazard conditions;5) vaccines are toxic and contain dangerous chemicals that can lead to hazard conditions;

  6. the use of vaccines contributes to the increase in the number of autoimmune diseases; 6) the use of vaccines contributes to the increase in the number of autoimmune diseases;

  7. mistrust of the seriousness of the vaccine industry;7) mistrust of the seriousness of the vaccine industry;

  8. worry and anxiety about the vaccine;8) worry and anxiety about the vaccine;

  9. vaccines are not necessary if people have good living conditions and use natural medicines;9) vaccines are not necessary if people have good living conditions and use natural medicines;

  10. influence of information from several and not official sources; 10) influence of information from several and not official sources;

  11. previous negative personal experiences with vaccination;11) previous negative personal experiences with vaccination;

  12. low perceived susceptibility and severity to illness;12) low perceived susceptibility and severity to illness;

  13. no vaccine recommendations by health professionals;13) no vaccine recommendations by health professionals;

  14. vaccine is not effective;14) vaccine is not effective;

  15. difficulty to remembering vaccination schedule.15) difficulty to remembering vaccination schedule.

Parents obtain information from different sources not always reliable. Internet websites, blogs, and articles discussing the risks and dangers of vaccines have caused confusion and uncertainties about the role of vaccines for human health [ 49 , 50 ].

What to do to increase acceptance of vaccines

Migratory movements, displacement in the socioeconomic status, and climatic changes have contributed to the emergence of a new situation related to the epidemiology of infectious diseases. Therefore, effective global prevention requires coordinated public health action, continuation of vaccinations in the population and the improvement in their accessibility [ 33 ].

Making appropriate attitudes toward vaccination is a long-term and complex process involving different segments of society. A fundamental action in effective vaccine communication is convincing parents that not vaccinating is the greater risk, that the probability of disease contraction is high if they don’t vaccinate their children and the consequences of getting these illnesses are severe [ 51 ].

Communication is the most effective tool to increase knowledge and awareness about vaccines and oppose all the prejudices due to current generalized misinformation. It is necessary to establish an openly, honest, interactive and respectful dialogue with parents and family in which natural concerns and fears must be listened and understood [ 31 , 34 ]. Since mothers play an important role in decisions on vaccination of their children, they should be one of the primary targeted publics from perspective of vaccination planning [ 2 ].

Public health professionals need to understand the various characteristics of parents and the reasons for the doubts about vaccination, so that they can be effectively addressed [ 52 ]. Understanding the arguments and concerns that individuals have about vaccines can allow for better communication regarding vaccines on the part of scientists [ 45 ]. Physicians and other health care providers play a crucial role in parental decision making with regard to immunization. Health care providers are still considered to be the most credible source of information on vaccination [ 33 , 34 , 55 ] cited by parents, including parents of unvaccinated children (30), and has been reported that they are the main reason for following the recommended vaccine schedule [ 10 , 54 , 55 , 56 ].

Efforts to support the professional endorsement of health professionals and confidence in vaccination are essential to restore and maintain vaccination as a standard among health communities [ 49 ]. For this two actions can be implemented: a) to remove socioeconomic barriers and disincentives to vaccination; b) to oppose misinformation regarding vaccines.

Having received a recommendation by their pediatrician to fully vaccinate their children appears to have significantly affected parental decision about vaccination [ 57 ]. Parents generally prefer to consult their pediatrician, who know their child’s full clinical history, and acts as the guardian of the protection of the life and health of the children [ 3 ], that than the immunization services which are perceived on as a place for vaccine administration [ 34 , 38 ].

And, in order for the doctor-patient relationship to be successful, medical practice must always more centered on the respect of patient autonomy, and, for that, it is necessary to supporting health professionals in their communication, demonstrating a willingness to listen respectfully, providing accurate information about both risks and benefits, encouraging questions, and acknowledging parental concerns are essential elements of this strategy [ 3 ]. Add to this some measures like establishing routine monitoring of vaccination attitudes to provide early warning in order to guide timely action (2); and maintain an effective follow-up program in childcare [ 58 ].

Finally, clinicians must set an example. We’re unlikely to achieve optimal vaccination rates until health care professionals comply with vaccine recommendations for themselves and their children [ 59 ].

Conclusion

The benefits of vaccination are demonstrated by the eradication or enormous decline in the incidence of many vaccine-preventable diseases and the importance, effectiveness and safety of vaccines in individual and collective protection against infectious disease and quality of life are unquestionable [ 28 , 57 ]. Vaccination must be a part of a holistic medical child treatment associated to breastfeeding, healthy food and protection against unintentional injuries.

The multifactorial and complex causes of vaccine refusal require a broad range of approaches, interventions, and system changes on the individual, provider, health system, and national levels [ 38 ]. All considerations on this subject indicate a need to consolidate the capacity of countries to locally identify the relevant causal factors of vaccine hesitancy and to develop strategies [ 34 , 60 ].

The interaction between patients and providers is the cornerstone of maintaining confidence in vaccination [ 30 , 57 ]. Interventions are needed on the individual level for parents who have vaccine concerns. First-time pregnant women are an ideal population to target, because first pregnancy is the “teachable moment” and attitudes and beliefs about childhood vaccines are frequently not fully formed at this point [ 38 ].

Vaccination has a broad societal and public health impact that is best understood at a population rather than at an individual level. [ 11 ]. Transparency in policy-making decisions regarding vaccination programs, providing education and information to the public and health providers about the rigorous process that leads to approval of new vaccines and diversified post-marketing surveillance of vaccine-related events should complement the actions in favor of vaccination [ 30 ]. All must take responsibility to encourage and provide the opportunities to vaccinate.

References

  1. Reasons related to non-vaccination and under-vaccination of children in low and middle income countries: Findings from a systematic review of the published literature, 1999–2009 Rainey JeanetteJ, Watkins Margaret, Ryman ToveK, Sandhu Paramjit, Bo Anne, Banerjee Kaushik. Vaccine.2011-oct;:8215-8221. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  2. Vaccine Hesitancy Dubé Eve, MacDonald NoniE. .2018. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  3. Future Strategies in Pediatric Obesity Prevention Teleman AA, Waure CDe, Poscia A, Pietro MLDi. European Journal of Public Health.2014-oct. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  4. Global Vaccine Action Plan Vaccine.2013-apr. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  5. Vaccine Refusal, Mandatory Immunization, and the Risks of Vaccine-Preventable Diseases Omer SaadB, Salmon DanielA, Orenstein WalterA, deHart MPatricia, Halsey Neal. New England Journal of Medicine.2009-may;:1981-1988. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  6. Rotavirus Vaccines: a story of success with challenges ahead O’Ryan Miguel. F1000Research.2017-aug. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  7. Individual decisions to vaccinate one\textquotesingles child or oneself: A discrete choice experiment rejecting free-riding motives Verelst Frederik, Willem Lander, Kessels Roselinde, Beutels Philippe. Social Science & Medicine.2018-jun;:106-116. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  8. Vaccination Refusal: Ethics, Individual Rights, and the Common Good Schwartz JasonL, Caplan ArthurL. Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice.2011-dec;:717-728. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  9. Vaccine Hesitancy: Where We Are and Where We Are Going McClure CatherineC, Cataldi JessicaR, O’Leary SeanT. Clinical Therapeutics.2017-aug;:1550-1562. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  10. Evaluation of Childhood Vaccine Refusal and Hesitancy Intentions in Turkey Topçu Seda, Alm\i\cs Habip, Ba\cskan Sevgi, Turgut Mehmet, Orhon Filiz\cSim\csek, Ulukol BetĂźl. The Indian Journal of Pediatrics.2018-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  11. 2. How is the economic assessment of vaccines performed today? Standaert Baudouin, Rappuoli Rino. Journal of Market Access & Health Policy.2017-jan. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  12. Promoting Vaccine Confidence Smith MichaelJ. Infectious Disease Clinics of North America.2015-dec;:759-769. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  13. Vaccination refusal. Autonomy and permitted coercion Grzybowski Andrzej, Patryn Rafa\lK, Sak Jaros\law, Zagaja Anna. Pathogens and Global Health.2017-may;:200-205. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  14. Global vaccine safety a priority for WHO &NA$\mathsemicolon$ Reactions Weekly.2012-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  15. Understanding vaccination resistance: Vaccine search term selection bias and the valence of retrieved information Ruiz JeanetteB, Bell RobertA. Vaccine.2014-oct;:5776-5780. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  16. Efficacy and safety of immunological adjuvants. Where is the cut-off? Batista-Duharte Alexander, Martínez DamianaTéllez, Carlos IracildaZeppone. Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy.2018-sep;:616-624. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  17. Vaccine-associated hypersensitivity McNeil MichaelM, DeStefano Frank. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology.2018-feb;:463-472. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  18. Safer Pertussis Vaccines for Children: Trading Efficacy for Safety Munoz FlorM. Pediatrics.2018-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  19. Three double-blind, randomized trials evaluating the safety and tolerance of different formulations of the saponin adjuvant QS-21 Waite DouglasC, Jacobson EricW, Ennis FrancisA, Edelman Robert, White Bernadette, Kammer Robert, Anderson Christine, Kensil CharlotteR. Vaccine.2001-jul;:3957-3967. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  20. On pins and needles: How vaccines are portrayed on Pinterest Guidry JeaninePD, Carlyle Kellie, Messner Marcus, Jin Yan. Vaccine.2015-sep;:5051-5056. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  21. Comparative Safety of Vaccine Adjuvants: A Summary of Current Evidence and Future Needs Petrovsky Nikolai. Drug Safety.2015-oct;:1059-1074. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  22. Frequently Asked Questions Frequently Asked Questions in IFRS.2015;:15-268. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  23. Responding to Parental Refusals of Immunization of Children Diekema DS. PEDIATRICS.2005-may;:1428-1431. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  24. Institute of Medicine (IOM). The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2007. Gracia Diego. EIDON nº 39.2013-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  25. The responsibility of separating truth from myth to patient and family Miller R. Haemophilia.2008-jul;:91-95. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  26. Deaths following vaccination: What does the evidence show? Miller ElaineR, Moro PedroL, Cano Maria, Shimabukuro TomT. Vaccine.2015-jun;:3288-3292. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  27. Risk of Guillain-Barré syndrome after seasonal influenza vaccination and influenza health-care encounters: a self-controlled study Kwong JeffreyC, Vasa PriyaP, Campitelli MichaelA, Hawken Steven, Wilson Kumanan, Rosella LauraC, Stukel ThereseA, Crowcroft NatashaS, McGeer AllisonJ, Zinman Lorne, Deeks ShelleyL. The Lancet Infectious Diseases.2013-sep;:769-776. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  28. Vaccine-preventable diseases, vaccines and Guillain-Barre’ syndrome Principi Nicola, Esposito Susanna. Vaccine.2018-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  29. Editorial (Thematic Issue: Communicating Vaccine Safety - The Vienna Vaccine Safety Initiative) Rath Barbara. Current Drug Safety.2015-apr;:3-4. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  30. Vaccine hesitancy Dubé Eve, Laberge Caroline, Guay Maryse, Bramadat Paul, Roy Réal, Bettinger JulieA. Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics.2013-aug;:1763-1773. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  31. Should we do battle with antivaccination activists? Leask Julie. Public Health Research & Practice.2015-mar. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  32. Vaccine Hesitancy Dubé Eve, MacDonald NoniE. .2018. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  33. Viral hepatitis C in Poland in the Silesian Province between 2005–2014 Braczkowska Bogumi\la, Kowalska Ma\lgorzata, Bara´nski Kamil, Mendera-Bo\.zek Urszula. Annals of Agricultural and Environmental Medicine.2017-jul. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  34. Parental vaccine hesitancy in Italy – Results from a national survey Giambi Cristina, Fabiani Massimo, D\textquotesingleAncona Fortunato, Ferrara Lorenza, Fiacchini Daniel, Gallo Tolinda, Martinelli Domenico, Pascucci MariaGrazia, Prato Rosa, Filia Antonietta, Bella Antonino, Manso MartinaDel, Rizzo Caterina, Rota MariaCristina. Vaccine.2018-feb;:779-787. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  35. Examining the “why” of vaccine hesitancy. Bednarczyk RobertA. Health Psychology.2018-apr;:316-317. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  36. Association Between Undervaccination With Diphtheria, Tetanus Toxoids, and Acellular Pertussis (DTaP) Vaccine and Risk of Pertussis Infection in Children 3 to 36 Months of Age Glanz JasonM, Narwaney KomalJ, Newcomer SophiaR, Daley MatthewF, Hambidge SimonJ, Rowhani-Rahbar Ali, Lee GraceM, Nelson JenniferC, Naleway AllisonL, Nordin JamesD, Lugg MarleneM, Weintraub EricS. JAMA Pediatrics.2013-nov. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  37. The behind-the-scenes activity of parental decision-making discourse regarding childhood vaccination Gesser-Edelsburg Anat, Walter Nathan, Shir-Raz Yaffa, Bar-Lev OshratSassoni, Rosenblat Shira. American Journal of Infection Control.2017-mar;:267-271. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  38. Vaccine Hesitancy Salmon DanielA, Dudley MatthewZ, Glanz JasonM, Omer SaadB. American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2015-dec. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  39. A Review of Traditional Vaccine-Preventable Diseases and the Potential Impact on the Otolaryngologist Greenlee Christopher, Newton Stephen. International Archives of Otorhinolaryngology.2017-jul;:317-329. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  40. Dr. Jekyll or Mr. Hyde? (How) the Internet influences vaccination decisions: Recent evidence and tentative guidelines for online vaccine communication Betsch Cornelia, Sachse Katharina. Vaccine.2012-may;:3723-3726. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  41. The Social Basis of Vaccine Questioning and Refusal: A Qualitative Study Employing Bourdieu’s Concepts of ‘Capitals’ and ‘Habitus’ Attwell Katie, Meyer Samantha, Ward Paul. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health.2018-may. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  42. The psychological roots of anti-vaccination attitudes: A 24-nation investigation. Hornsey MatthewJ, Harris EmilyA, Fielding KellyS. Health Psychology.2018-apr;:307-315. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  43. Adjuvants — a balance between toxicity and adjuvanticity Gupta RajeshK, Relyveld EdgarH, Lindblad ErikB, Bizzini Bernard, Ben-Efraim Shlomo, Gupta ChanderKanta. Vaccine.1993-jan;:293-306. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  44. Vaccine Hesitancy Salmon DanielA, Dudley MatthewZ, Glanz JasonM, Omer SaadB. American Journal of Preventive Medicine.2015-dec. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  45. Vaccine Rejection and Hesitancy: A Review and Call to Action Smith TaraC. Open Forum Infectious Diseases.2017. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  46. A systematic review of factors affecting vaccine uptake in young children Smith LouiseE, Amlôt Richard, Weinman John, Yiend Jenny, Rubin GJames. Vaccine.2017-oct;:6059-6069. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  47. Vaccine hesitancy around the globe: Analysis of three years of WHO/UNICEF Joint Reporting Form data-2015–2017 Lane Sarah, MacDonald NoniE, Marti Melanie, Dumolard Laure. Vaccine.2018-jun;:3861-3867. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  48. The Effects of Anti-Vaccine Conspiracy Theories on Vaccination Intentions Jolley Daniel, Douglas KarenM, Tripp Ralph. PLoS ONE.2014-feb. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  49. The paradox of vaccine hesitancy among healthcare professionals Karafillakis E, Larson HJ. Clinical Microbiology and Infection.2018-aug;:799-800. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  50. Parents\textquotesingle and informal caregivers\textquotesingle views and experiences of communication about routine childhood vaccination: a synthesis of qualitative evidence Ames HeatherMR, Glenton Claire, Lewin Simon. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews.2017-feb. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  51. Countering antivaccination attitudes Horne Zachary, Powell Derek, Hummel JohnE, Holyoak KeithJ. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.2015-aug;:10321-10324. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  52. Parents With Doubts About Vaccines: Which Vaccines and Reasons Why Gust DA, Darling N, Kennedy A, Schwartz B. PEDIATRICS.2008-oct;:718-725. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  53. Global Vaccine Action Plan Vaccine.2013-apr. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  54. Vaccine Hesitancy in Pediatric Primary Care Practices Mohanty Salini, Carroll-Scott Amy, Wheeler Marissa, Davis-Hayes Cecilia, Turchi Renee, Feemster Kristen, Yudell Michael, Buttenheim AlisonM. Qualitative Health Research.2018-jun. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  55. Vaccine Hesitancy Jacobson RobertM, Sauver JenniferLSt, Rutten LilaJFinney. Mayo Clinic Proceedings.2015-nov;:1562-1568. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  56. Attitudes to vaccination: A critical review Yaqub Ohid, Castle-Clarke Sophie, Sevdalis Nick, Chataway Joanna. Social Science & Medicine.2014-jul;:1-11. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  57. Vaccine refusal – what we need to know Succi ReginaCéliadeMenezes. Jornal de Pediatria.2018-apr. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  58. The Architecture of Provider-Parent Vaccine Discussions at Health Supervision Visits Opel DJ, Heritage J, Taylor JA, Mangione-Smith R, Salas HS, DeVere V, Zhou C, Robinson JD. PEDIATRICS.2013-nov;:1037-1046. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  59. Improving Childhood Vaccination Rates Diekema DouglasS. New England Journal of Medicine.2012-feb;:391-393. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]
  60. Mapping vaccine hesitancy—Country-specific characteristics of a global phenomenon Dubé Eve, Gagnon Dominique, Nickels Emily, Jeram Stanley, Schuster Melanie. Vaccine.2014-nov;:6649-6654. [ CrossRef ] [Google Scholar]

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author's Affiliation

Copyrights & License

International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical invention, 2018.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Article Details


Issue: Vol 5 No 9 (2018)
Page No.: 4056-4060
Section: Articles
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmsci/v5i9.05

Citation

Ciampo, L. A. D., & Ciampo, I. R. L. D. (2018). To vaccinate or not to vaccinate is this doubt justified?. International Journal of Medical Science and Clinical invention, 5(9), 4056-4060. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijmsci/v5i9.05

  • HTML Viewed - 0 Times
  • PDF Downloaded - 0 Times
  • XML Downloaded - 0 Times