Abstract

Background:  Diabetic patients are a subset of emergency and general surgery patients and have a higher risk of postoperative complications including pulmonary and urinary infections, acute cardiac infarction, kidney failure, and death compared to non-diabetic patients.

Objectives: The study assessed the prevalence of postoperative complications in diabetic patients and non-diabetics in Saudi Arabia from 2016 to 2021.

Methodology: This was a community-based observational descriptive cross-sectional study. Sample is 205 diabetic and non-diabetic participants over 18 years underwent abdominal surgery between 2016 and 2021 in Saudi Arabia. A self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data.

Results: Regarding SSI, diabetic patients reported 27% wound erythema, 25% wound pain, and 24% wound pus. It was discovered that 34.1% of patients with poor wound healing,50% of individuals identified with DVT as a postoperative consequence,32.35% with UTI, 54.6% confirmed cases of post-operative incisional hernias, and 42.85% of patients with metabolic acidosis all of them were having diabetes millets. Regarding thrombophlebitis, 28.6% of patients with limb erythema and 21.1 percent of patients with hot and painful limbs were diabetics. Regarding bowel obstruction, only 23.68 percent of patients with acute stomach pain, 28 percent of patients with sudden vomiting, and 22.58 percent of patients with chronic constipation with gas retention had diabetes.

Conclusion: DVT, UTI, and incisional hernia have all been found to be more common post-operative problems among diabetics. There was a modest difference in wound healing, wound infection, intestinal obstruction, thrombophlebitis, and metabolic acidosis between diabetics and non-diabetics.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Introduction

Postoperative complications are quite common issue in many hospitals in the entire world. It is defined as any change in the normal function of the body after the surgery (1). There is more than 14 million surgical procedure is done annually in the United States, 30% of these patients develop post-operative complications (2), most of them is not significant but still it is a significant issue because it has a mortality rate from 0.79 to 5.7%. Postoperative complications are divided into two types: early complications that happen within 30 days after the surgery and late which happen after 30 days. The most of postoperative complications include fever, surgical site infection and poor wound healing (3)

Over the last 30 years; the global number of diabetic patients has been growing rapidly, (4) so the prevalence of DM in Saudi Arabia is also on the rise (5). Because of high blood glucose, metabolic disorders, and other factors, diabetic patients are more susceptible to cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, osteoporosis, tumours, and other diseases. (6) Diabetic patients constitute a subcategory of patients who undergo emergency and general surgery procedures (5). As compared to non-diabetic patients, diabetic patients hold a higher risk of postoperative complications including infections as pulmonary and urinary infection, acute cardiac infarct, kidney failure and death. (7) This is a significant concern because it is estimated that over half of worldwide diabetic population would require a minimum of one surgical procedure during their lifetime.(8) Postoperative complications lead to long hospital stay, increase the economic burden, and increase mortality.(9–11) Diabetic patients in Saudi Arabia are always considered a high risk population in surgical departments because they make a challenge to surgeons in different surgery subspecialty, as hyperglycaemia disturbs many body functions such as wound healing and response to surgical trauma.(5)

This study aims to: assess the prevalence of postoperative complications in diabetic patients compared to non-diabetic.

Methodology :

Research Approach:

Study Design: This was an observational descriptive cross-sectional community-based study design (2020-2022).

Study Area and Population: The population of this study was diabetic patients of different ages starting with 18, who did abdominal surgeries between 2016-2021, in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.

Sample Size and Technique: The sample consists of 205 diabetic patients with previous abdominal surgery, which were selected using the quota sampling technique.

Data Needs:

Data Collection Tools:

The data was collected by using self -administered questionnaire designed especially for the study. The questionnaire included questions about some post-op complications and their symptoms as surgical site infection, poor wound healing, deep vein thrombosis, metabolic acidosis, urinary tract infection, incisional hernia, thrombophlebitis, and bowel obstruction.

Data Analysis:

The data were coded, entered, and analysed using SPSS. The results were expressed in tables as frequencies and percentages. Suitable statistical tests of significance were used. P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical Issues:

The consent was taken from the participants verbally. The collected data was only used for research purposes. Confidentiality was committed and ensured.

Tables and Results

Symptom Yes No
Wound Erythema 60 (29.3%) 145 (70.7%)
Wound pain 78 (38.0%) 127 (62.0%)
Wound pus 33 (16.1%) 172 (83.9%)
Table 1. Surgical Site Infection

Table (1) illustrate that 29.3% of the patients had redness over the surgical wound, 38.0% had pain over the surgical wound and 16.1% had experienced pus coming out of there surgical wounds.

Symptom Diabetic Non-diabetic
Wound Erythema 13 (21.7%) 47(78.3%)
Wound pain 16 (20.5%) 62 (79.5%)
Wound pus 8 (24.2%) 25 (75.8%)
Table 2. Diabetes and Surgical Site Infection

Table (2) shows that 21.7% of the patient who had wound erythema are diabetics, 20.5% of the patient who had wound pain are diabetics, and 24.2% of the patients had experience pus coming out of there surgical wounds are diabetics. These numbers are considered statistically insignificant.

Complication Yes No
Poor wound healing 47 (22.9%) 158 (77.1%)
DVT 10 (4.9%) 195 (95.1%)
Metabolic acidosis 7 (3.4%) 198 (96.6%)
Table 3. Poor Wound Healing, Deep Vein Thrombosis and Metabolic Acidosis.

According to Table) 3), 22.9 percent of participants have been told by the physicians that the surgical wounds are complicated as poor healing. Also, this table shows that only 4.9% have been told by their doctors that their surgeries complicated with deep venous thrombosis. In addition, the table shows that 3.4% of patients were complicated with metabolic acidosis.

Complication Diabetic Non-diabetic
Poor healing 14 (34.1%) 33 (20.1%)
DVT 5 (50%) 5 (50%)
Metabolic acidosis 3 (1.5%) 4(2%)
Table 4. Diabetes with Poor Healing, Deep Venous Thrombosis and Metabolic Acidosis.

As per Table (4), diabetic individuals accounting for 34.1 percentage of patients with poor wound healing. These statistics shows no significant correlation between diabetes and poor wound healing (P = 0.056). In addition, this table shows that 50% of the patients who were diagnosed with DVT are diabetics which is considered statistically significant (p=0.015). Also, this table shows that diabetic patients account 1.5% of patients who were complicated with metabolic acidosis. These proportions were statistically not significant (P=0.125).

Symptom Yes No
Dysuria 36 (17.56%) 82.44%))169
Urgency and frequency 39 (19.02%) 166 (80.98%)
Complication Yes No
UTI 34 (16.95%) 171 (83.41%)
Table 5. Urinary Tract Infection

According to table (5), 17.56% of the patients had dysuria, 19.02% had urgency and frequency and 16.95% of the patients had UTI.

Symptom Diabetic Non-diabetic
Dysuria 13(36.11%) 23(63.89%)
Urgency and Frequency 15(38.46%) 24(61.54%)
Complication Diabetic Non-Diabetic
UTI 11 (32.35%) 23(67.65%)
Table 6. Diabetes and Urinary Tract Infection

Table (6) shows that 36.11% of diabetic patients had dysuria, which showed weak evidence (p=0.008) in comparison of non-diabetic patients. 38.46% of them had urgency and frequency, 32.35% of diabetics had UTI and in which both were evident with P values (= 0.001) and (=0.049) respectively as compared to non-diabetic.

Symptoms Yes N0
Wound mass 22(10.7%) 183(89.3%)
Increase mass size 18(8.8%) 187(91.2%)
Decrease mass size 19(9.3%) 186(90.7%)
Reversible mass 19(9.3%) 186(90.7%)
Mass pain 18(8.8%) 187(91.2%)
Complication Yes No
Incisional hernia 11(5.4%) 194(94.6%)
Table 7. Incisional Hernia

Table (7) shows that 5.4% of patients were diagnosed with incisional hernia, 10.7% reported a history of a mass at wound site, 8.8% reported a mass that increases with exertion. 9.3% reported a history of mass that decreases when lying down, 9.3% reported a history of a reversible mass, 8.8% reported a history of a painful mass and 10.7% reported a history of a mass at wound site.

Symptom Diabetic Non- diabetic
Wound mass 10(45.4%) 12(54.5%)
Increase mass size 8(45.5%) 10(55.5%)
Decrease mass size 8(42.1%) 11(57.9%)
Reversible mass 8(42.1%) 11(57.9%)
Mass pain 7(38.9%) 11(61.1%)
Complication Diabetic Non-diabetic
Incisional hernia 6(54.6%) 5(45.4%)
Table 8. Diabetes and Incisional Hernia

Table (8) shows 45.4% of those who reported post-op wound mass were diabetic, 45.5% of those who reported a postoperative wound mass at wound site that increases with movement were diabetic, 38.9% of patients who reported a post-op wound painful mass were diabetics, 54.6% of confirmed cases of post-operative incisional hernias were diabetic. These results are considered statistically significant (P=0.001), (P=0.006), (P = 0.036), (P=0.003) respectively

Symptom Yes No
Limb erythema 7 (3.4%) 198 (96.6%)
Limb hotness and pain 19 (9.3%) 186 (90.7%)
Table 9. Thrombophlebitis

This table illustrate that only 7 patients (3.4%) had red strikes on the limbs after their surgeries, and 9.3% had limb hotness and pain after their surgeries

Symptom Diabetic Non-diabetic
Limb erythema 2 (28.6%) 5(71.4%)
Limb hotness and pain 4 (21.1%) 15(78.9%)
Table 10. Diabetes and Thrombophlebitis

The table shows that 28.6% of patients who had limb erythema were diabetic which is statistically insignificant (p=0.566). 21.1% who complained of hot and painful limb were diabetic which is statistically insignificant also. (p=0.905).

Symptom Yes no
Sudden abdominal pain 38 (18.5%) 167 (81.5%)
Sudden vomiting 39 (19%) 166 (81%)
Chronic constipation and gas retention 62 (30.2%) 143 (69.8%)
Table 11. Bowel Obstruction

Table (11) illustrate that 18.5% of the patients had experienced sudden abdominal pain, 19.0% had sudden vomiting and 30.2% had chronic constipation and gas retention.

Symptom Diabetic Non-Diabetic
Sudden abdominal pain 9 (23.68%) 29 (76.32)
Sudden vomiting 11 (28.21%) 28 (71.79%)
Chronic constipation and gas retention 14 (22.58%) 48 (77.42%)
Table 12. Diabetes and Bowel Obstruction:

Table (12) shows the percentage of diabetic to non-diabetic patients who had experienced symptoms of bowel obstruction; 23.68% of patients who had sudden abdominal pain where diabetic, 28.21% of patients who experienced sudden vomiting where diabetic and 22.58% of patients who had chronic constipation and gas retention where diabetic. Accordingly, the correlation between bowel obstruction and diabetes was not significant.

Discussion

In this research, we did not find any correlation between diabetes and surgical site infection after abdominal surgeries, maybe because patients controlled their blood glucose level before surgery or even took antiseptic shower before the operation. This result is like the result found in study done by Ismat,2016, Pakistan. (12)

This study did not show any association between diabetes and poor wound healing after abdominal surgeries. This finding may be because patients tried hard to avoid local factors that affect wound healing such as trauma and foreign bodies. This finding in our study is like the research in Mangeshkar Hospital in Pune, India,2009. (14)

The study showed an association between diabetes and having post-op DVT, which coincide with the results of a study conducted in China between 2011-2013, that came to conclusion that the incidence of DVT 14 days (about 2 weeks) after total knee arthroplasty was significantly higher in patients with than without diabetes (15), this emphasis the importance of appropriate anti-coagulant therapy and monitoring for diabetic patients during and after surgeries.

The research data did not show a significant effect of diabetic on having post-op metabolic acidosis when it is diagnosed pre-operatively, mostly due to the strict monitoring of blood glucose before, during and after surgery. A case report was published in India 2016 about an undiscovered DM case that was diagnosed for the first time at OR settings after experiencing a DKA directly after surgery, this proves the significance of strict monitoring of BG in surgeries and emphases the importance of measuring HbA1C to protect against life-threatening complications. (23)

Diabetes has an association with post-operative UTI incidence, it may increase the risk of all types of infections as it is proven also in a study conducted in USA 2010, where patients complicated diabetes had a significantly higher rate of postoperative infection. (17)

The proportions of those who showed symptoms of incisional hernia were higher in diabetic patients, the thing that may be explained by a study conducted in India between 2015-2017, that showed that diabetic patients are more likely to become infected with postoperative wounds and both lead to an increased rate of incisional hernia. (21)

The proportion of those who showed symptoms of thrombophlebitis has no significant correlation with being a diabetic patient. The reason might be that patients are aware of the risk factors for thrombophlebitis such as trauma and prolonged inactivity, so they do everything possible to avoid them. This finding is like the one conducted by Saji in 2005, in Kolenchery. (24)

Bowel obstruction showed no association with having diabetes millets, this is expected if patients have no history of constipation, which is different from the results of a study conducted in Paris in 2006 that aimed to calculate the incidence and risk factors of recurrent adhesive small bowel obstruction after surgical treatment with consideration for ASA status, results showed that patients with high ASA status which includes diabetic patients are at an elevated risk of bowel obstruction. (25)

Conclusion

DVT was found to be higher in diabetic patients as post-operative complications, mostly because of feeble anticoagulant coverage. This goes the same with UTI and incisional hernia, mainly because diabetic patients are liable to infections and deficiency in caring for such. Difference between diabetic and non-diabetic patients results in poor wound healing, surgical infection, bowel obstruction, thrombophlebitis and metabolic acidosis showed slight variation; however, it did not reach a significant value.

Recommendation

1-Efforts should be made for better care of diabetic patients. It is proposed to control blood sugar levels before, during and after surgery.

2-Doctors should ensure covering patients with anti-coagulant to prevent patients from DVT.

3- To get proper prevention from UTI, doctors should encourage patients to drink fluids, and most important is to take antibiotics as ordered.

4- Managing blood sugar and avoid straining of abdominal muscles too much in the first few months after abdominal surgery could prevent incisional hernia.

Acknowledgment

Authors would like to thank Almaarefa University for guidance and financial support given for publication of this research.

References

  1. Brioude, G., Gust, L., Thomas, P. A., & D'Journo, X. B. (2019). Complications postopératoires des exérèses pulmonaires [Postoperative complications after major lung resection]. Revue des maladies respiratoires, 36(6), 720–737. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmr.2018.09.004
  2. Tevis, S. E., & Kennedy, G. D. (2013). Postoperative complications and implications on patient-centered outcomes. The Journal of surgical research, 181(1), 106–113.
  3. Endo, I., Kumamoto, T., & Matsuyama, R. (2017). Postoperative complications and mortality: Are they unavoidable?. Annals of gastroenterological surgery, 1(3), 160–163.
  4. . International Diabetes Federation. International Diabetes Federation Diabetes Atlas, 7th ed. 2015.
  5. Altaf A. Effect of diabetes mellitus on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing emergency general surgery procedures. Biomedical Research.2019;30-19-333
  6. . Bragg F, Holmes MV, Iona A, et al. Association between diabetes and cause-specific mortality in rural and urban areas of China. JAMA 2017;317:280–9.
  7. Wang, Jinjing MMeda,b; Chen, Kang MDa; Li, Xueqiong MDa,c; Jin, Xinye MDa; An, Ping MMeda; Fang, Yi MDd; Mu, Yiming MDa,∗. Postoperative adverse events in patients with diabetes undergoing orthopedic and general surgery. Medicine: April 2019 - Volume 98 - Issue 14 - p e15089 doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015089
  8. Sudhakaran S, Surani SR. Guidelines for perioperative management of the diabetic patient. Surg Res Pract 2015;2015:284063.
  9. Kotagal M, Symons RG, Hirsch IB, et al. Perioperative hyperglycemia, and risk of adverse events among patients with and without diabetes. Ann Surg 2015;261:97–103.
  10. Sebranek JJ, Lugli AK, Coursin DB. Glycaemic control in the perioperative period. Br J Anaesth 2013;111(suppl 1):i18–34.
  11. Frisch A, Chandra P, Smiley D, et al. Prevalence and clinical outcome of hyperglycemia in the perioperative period in noncardiac surgery. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1783–8.
  12. Ismat U, Khan A, Nawaz A, et al. Surgical Site Infection in Diabetic and Non-Diabetic Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016;26(2):100-102.
  13. Wukich DK, Lowery NJ, McMillen RL, Frykberg RG. Postoperative infection rates in foot and ankle surgery: a comparison of patients with and without diabetes mellitus. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2010;92:287–295pmid:20124054
  14. Mangrulkar S, Khair PS. Comparison of healing of surgical wounds between diabetics and non-diabetics. J Indian Med Assoc. 2009;107(11):765-770.
  15. Yang G, Meng F, Liu Y, Kong L, Shen Y. Diabetes mellitus and risk of deep vein thrombosis after total knee replacement: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Int J ClinExp Med. 2015;8(6):9086-9092. Published 2015 Jun 15.
  16. Zhao Z, Wang S, Ma W, et al. Diabetes mellitus increases the incidence of deep vein thrombosis after total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(1):79-83. doi:10.1007/s00402-013-1894
  17. Di Capua J, Lugo-Fagundo N, Somani S, et al. Diabetes Mellitus as a Risk Factor for Acute Postoperative Complications Following Elective Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery. Global Spine Journal. 2018;8(6):615-621. doi:10.1177/2192568218761361
  18. Ramsey T, Giaccio SL and Navarro FA. Postoperative Complications of Colectomy in Diabetes Patients. Austin J Surg. 2017; 4(4): 1111.
  19. Martis, Gábor, and Damjanovich, László. "Incisionalis sérvek és diabetes mellitus. - Tudunk javítani az eredményeken?." Lege Artis Medicinae 25, no. 06-07 (2015): 249-256
  20. SIDHU, Ankur; SIEDLER, Declan; TURNER, Richard. Factors affecting the development of ventral incisional hernia post abdominal surgery. International Surgery Journal, [S.l.], v. 4, n. 10, p. 3225-3227, sep. 2017. ISSN 2349-2902.
  21. Nagaraju V, Kumar GS, Geethanjali K. Study of Incisional Hernia in Relation to Specific Risk Factors. Int J Sci Stud 2018;6(7):155-158
  22. Lawton.TO, Quinn. A, Fletcher.SJ. Perioperative metabolic acidosis: The Bradford Anaesthetic Department Acidosis Study. Journal of the Intensive Care Society. 2019; 20(1): 11-17.
  23. Haldar,R , , A , Gupta, D, etal. Acute post-operative diabetic ketoacidosis: Atypical harbinger unmasking latent diabetes mellitus, Indian JAnaesth. 2016 Oct; 60(10): 763–765.
  24. Saji.J, Korula.S, Mathew.A et al.The Incidence of Thrombophlebitis Following the Use of Peripheral Intravenous Cannula in Post-Operative Patients A Prospective Observational Study. IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences.2015;Volume 14, Issue 6 : 01-04.
  25. Jean-Jacques Duron, Nathalie Jourdan-Da Silva, Sophie Tezenas du Montcel, et al. Adhesive Postoperative Small Bowel Obstruction: Incidence and Risk Factors of Recurrence After Surgical Treatment. Ann Surg. 2006 Nov; 244(5): 750–757